Search

Search results

Showing 881-890 of 1000 results for BRANZ-CM-1002-Rev 1​
Sorted by relevancy

1994/001: Sanitary facilities in a restaurant

N/A

About this document

2015/013: Regarding a dispute about which fire risk group should be used in determining compliance of proposed accommodation at a holiday park

The dispute turned on which Acceptable Solution (C/AS1 or C/AS2) applied to the proposed building work, depending on whether it fell within Risk Group SH or SM. Discussed the relationship between Uses as defined in the Regulations, Risk Groups in the Acceptable Solutions and Classified Uses in the Act. Also discussed “intended use”, and the Risk Groups in relation to household units located above car parks.

About this document

2006/112: Stability of a house on a riverside site

Note: The decisions in this Determination were confirmed on appeal to the High Court. See: Davidson v Palmerston North City Council (High Court, Palmerston North, 30 May 2008, CIV-2006-085-1462).Appeal judgment [PDF 100 KB]

About this document

This information is published by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Chief Executive. It is a general guide only and, if used, does not relieve any person of the obligation to consider any matter to which the information relates according to the circumstances of the particular case. Expert advice may be required in specific circumstances. Where this information relates to assisting people:

Print this page (recommended)

This will print only the current page of this guidance document.

Print this page

Cancel