Search

Search results

Showing 871-880 of 1000 results for BRANZ-CM-1002-Rev 1​
Sorted by relevancy

2012/049: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 16 year-old house with monolithic cladding

Explanatory note

This determination contained an error when it was issued on 12 July 2012. At Paragraph 6.5.2 it read, "No compelling reasons have been submitted to support the view that Clause E2 should be waived. I consider that such a waiver would be appropriate in this instance."

The word "not" was mistakenly omitted from the second sentence. To correct this error, paragraph 6.5.2 is now to be read as follows, "No compelling reasons have been submitted to support the view that Clause E2 should be waived. I consider that such a waiver would not be appropriate in this instance."

About this document

Factsheet on specifying residential ground improvement (supporting Module 5A)

Key benefits of Module 5A, a geotechnical guideline outlining residential ground improvements specification requirements

Issue 10 - June 2018 (Updates and clarifications to the residential guidance)

1 clarification on technical issues relating to the residential guidance for Canterbury

2017/035: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 18-year-old house

This determination is concerned with the compliance of an 18-year-old house. The determination considers the authority’s reasons for refusing the code compliance certificate, and whether the house complies with the requirements of the Building Code, particularly with respect to weathertightness and durability.

This information is published by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Chief Executive. It is a general guide only and, if used, does not relieve any person of the obligation to consider any matter to which the information relates according to the circumstances of the particular case. Expert advice may be required in specific circumstances. Where this information relates to assisting people: