The purpose of this Practice Advisory is to increase awareness of the importance of quality assurance systems and of the building control system we operate in.
This information was confirmed as current in December 2016.
This Practice Advisory is issued as guidance information in accordance with section 175 of the Building Act 2004 and, if used, does not relieve any person of the obligation to consider any matter to which the information relates according to the circumstances of the particular case. This document is not a compliance document in terms of the Act and not a substitute for professional advice.
The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission (CERC) identified systemic quality assurance issues related to the building regulatory system. From many perspectives, from Building Code compliance to customer satisfaction, it is imperative that all organisations involved in building projects implement an appropriate quality assurance programme.
Quality assurance systems
Quality assurance is necessary for successful building outcomes. Quality assurance of all work should occur at all stages throughout the building process, from project inception to final commissioning and handover. Quality assurance reviews enable the early identification and remediation of any shortcomings in design and construction, resulting in efficiencies and savings in project delivery.
For more information on appropriate quality processes in an engineering design office practice, refer to IPENZ-ACENZ Practice Note 14: Structural engineering design office practice on the IPENZ website.
For more information on the use of appropriate documentation to support quality design outcomes, refer to:
- Certificates of Work, Producer Statements, and Design Features Reports by Chartered Professional Engineers
- New Zealand Construction Industry Council’s design documentation guidelines. The previous guidelines are available on the Association of Consulting Engineers New Zealand website
Design features report
- Building designs often involve complex technical concepts, assumptions and judgements. It is imperative that these design assumptions and parameters be well-communicated for peer-review and consenting purposes. This information can also be very valuable to building owners.
- A convenient way to articulate a building’s structural philosophy is through a Design Features Report, which describes key elements of design, including design actions, load paths, the foundations and lateral load resisting systems. Report templates have been prepared by SESOC to complement the Construction Industry Council Design Documentation Guidelines.
- Design features reports should supplement notes and descriptions in the calculations.
Producer statement and consenting
Producer statements are widely used to assist Building Consent Authorities in deciding on ‘reasonable grounds’, if the design of a building work complies with the Building Code or if construction complies with the approved building consent. Although producer statements do not have statutory status under the Building Act 2004, it should be remembered that:
- The intent, scope and any limitations of the producer statements are clearly set out
- It is the responsibility of the design team to ensure that the proposed building work meets the Building Code and the responsibility of the contractor to construct the works in accordance with the contract documents.
For more information, refer to IPENZ Practice Note 1: Guidelines on producer statements on the IPENZ website.
Design peer review
Design peer reviews can be critical in achieving building designs which comply with the Building Code.
- The scope and type of review should be clarified early in the peer review process.
- It is recommended that peer reviewers are engaged from the onset of a project, especially for a complex building design.
- It is generally desirable to have complex building work and Alternative Solutions independently peer reviewed.
- If a peer review is not going to be commissioned, make sure other processes are adequate to assure compliance with the Building Code. This does not mean you can rely on the building consent authority to identify issues. Remember the responsibility lies with designers to produce code compliant designs.
For more information, refer to ACENZ / IPENZ Practice Note 2: Peer review on the IPENZ website.
On-site construction monitoring (preferably by the designer who is a Chartered Professional Engineer) is necessary to verify or confirm that projects are built to the design documents. Critical design assumptions and design features (e.g. correct potential plastic hinge zone detailing or assumed separation of secondary elements) may require a higher level of monitoring. An increase in construction monitoring can usually decrease the risks of non-compliance.
However, the level of construction monitoring should suit the size and complexity of the project. Guidance on an appropriate level of monitoring can be found in the matrices in Guidance on Construction monitoring services on the IPENZ website.
Building control system
A basic principle of the building control system is that the Building Code (which is Schedule 1 to the Building Regulations 1992) sets out the minimum performance requirements for all new building work. Building owners have the choice to set higher performance levels to achieve better performance, (such as the use of low damage building technologies). In addition, all building work must comply with the Building Code, irrespective of the need for a building consent.
MBIE’s Building Code Handbook provides background information on the building control system. There are also regular MBIE advisories and updates to which practitioners are recommended to subscribe, such as Building Control Updates, Determinations, and Codewords.
- Association of Consulting Engineers New Zealand (ACENZ) & The Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ), (2003).
Peer Review: Reviewing the work of another engineer (Practice Note 2)
- The Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ), (n.d.).
Construction Monitoring Services
- The Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) & Association of Consulting Engineers New Zealand (ACENZ), (2009).
Structural Engineering Design Office Practice (Practice Note 14)
- The Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) & Association of Consulting Engineers New Zealand (ACENZ), (2014).
Guidelines on Producer Statements (3). (Practice Note 1)
- Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (2013).
Guidance on the use of Certificates of Work, Producer Statements, and Design Features Reports by Chartered Professional Engineers under the new Restricted Building Work regime [PDF 1.6 MB]
- Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (2014).
New Zealand Building Code handbook
- New Zealand Construction Industry Council (NZCIC), (Release dates up to 2014).
Design: Documentation Guidelines on the Masterspec website
- Structural Engineering Society New Zealand Inc. (SESOC), (2010). Commercial Building Design Features Report (Member’s template).